AGB of Tamarix remote sensing estimation research based on GF-1 image -take Changyi Tamarix national special marine reserves as an example
YANG Guo-qiang1, MA Yi2, WANG Jian-bu2, Bao Yu-hai1, XIE Lin-ping2, WANG Min2
1. College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China;
2. First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China
Abstract：As a typical specie in coastal wetland, Tamarix grows in intertidal and supratidal zone and is very important for protection of the coast and the improvement of the shoal. The "NAN HONG BEI LIU" wetland restoration project have been put forward clearly under the "13th Five-Year" plan of national economic and social development, which show that Tamarix plays a key role in coast protection. So, it is of great significance for Tamarix protection to estimate widespreadly the biomass by using remote sensing technology. In this paper, Taking Changyi Tamarix national special marine reserves as an example, GF-1 data which is developed by ourselves and in stiu measured data is used to establish Tamarix above-ground biomass (AGB) estimation model and choose optimal model, the model is applied in study area. The results show:(1) As one of five vegetation index, the correlation coefficient of RVI and Tamarix AGB is the highest, that is 0.686; (2) The determination coefficient of cubic polynomial model with RVI is the highest, it is 0.81. MRE and RMSE of model is the smallest, which is 4.7% and 0.05 kg/m2 separately. (3) Combined with GF-1 image which is received in September 5, 2014 in the national special marine reserves, the model of cubic polynomial model with RVI is used to estimate AGB of Tamarix, the average AGB Tamarisk is 0.75 kg/m2 and the total biomass of 15020 t in study area.
YANG Guo-qiang,MA Yi,WANG Jian-bu et al. AGB of Tamarix remote sensing estimation research based on GF-1 image -take Changyi Tamarix national special marine reserves as an example[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2018, 37(1): 78-85,94.
RUNNING S W,NEMANI RR,PETERSON D L,et al.Mapping regional forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by coupling satellite data with ecosystem simulation[J].Ecology:Ecological Society of America,1989,70(4):1090-1101.
[3]
FRIEND A D,STEVENS A K,KNOX R G,et al.A process-based,terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (hybrid v3.0)[J].Ecological Modelling,1997,95(2/3):249-287.
[4]
MAHMOOD K,CHUGHTAI M I,AWAN A R,et al.Biomass production of some salt tolerant tree species grown in different ecological zones of Pakistan[J].Pakistan Journal of Botany,2016,48(1):89-96.
[5]
EVANGELISTA P,KUMAR S,STOHLGREN T J,et al.Modeling aboveground biomass of tamarix ramosissima in the Arkansas river basin of southeastern Colorado,USA[J].Brigham Young University,2007,67(4):503-509.
[6]
STABLER L B,STILL S M.Density and biomass of salt cedar (Tamarix spp.) along a northwest to southeast transect in Oklahoma[J].Oklahoma Academy of Science,2011,91:1-10.
LATIFI H,FASSNACHT F E,HARTIG F,et al.Stratified aboveground forest biomass estimation by remote sensingdata[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2015,38:229-241.
[11]
LUCAS R M,MITCHELL A L,ARMSTON J.Measurement of forest above-ground biomass using active and passive remote sensing at large (subnational to global)scales[J].Current Forestry Reports,2015,1(3):162-177.
ROUSE J,HAAS R H,SCHELL J A,et al.Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS[C]//Proceedings of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 3D ERTS-1 Symposium.Washington,DC,USA:NASA,1974.
[20]
RICHARDSON A J,WEIGAND C L.Distinguishing vegetation from soil backgroundinformation[J].Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,1977,43(12):1541-1552.
[21]
BIRTH G S,MCVEY G R.Measuring the color of growing turf with a reflectancespectrophotometer[J].Agronomy Journal,1968,60(6):640-643.
[22]
HUETE A R.A Soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,1988,25(3):295-309.
[23]
QI J,CHEHBOUNI A,HUETE A R,et al.A modified soil adjusted vegetation index[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,1994,48(2):119-126.
