张坤珵, 郭佩芳, 侍茂崇, 石洪源, 杨树清. 基于TOPSIS的中国不同海岛(群)发展比较研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2020, 39(4): 497-504. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20190082
引用本文: 张坤珵, 郭佩芳, 侍茂崇, 石洪源, 杨树清. 基于TOPSIS的中国不同海岛(群)发展比较研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2020, 39(4): 497-504. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20190082
ZHANG Kun-cheng, GUO Pei-fang, SHI Mao-chong, SHI Hong-yuan, YANG Shu-qing. Comparative study on the development of different islands (groups) in China based on TOPSIS[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 39(4): 497-504. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20190082
Citation: ZHANG Kun-cheng, GUO Pei-fang, SHI Mao-chong, SHI Hong-yuan, YANG Shu-qing. Comparative study on the development of different islands (groups) in China based on TOPSIS[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 39(4): 497-504. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20190082

基于TOPSIS的中国不同海岛(群)发展比较研究

Comparative study on the development of different islands (groups) in China based on TOPSIS

  • 摘要: 在海洋强国的战略下,由于海岛特殊的自然条件制约其发展,对比与其临近的陆域来说较为落后。我国海岛大多数成群地散布在各个海区,并在人类向海发展的进程中起到了桥头堡的作用,因此海岛的发展问题得到了我国各个沿海省市广泛关注。由海岛群资源供给能力、海岛群生态环境承载能力、海岛群经济发展能力和海岛群社会支持能力四个层面上选取评价指标构建评价模型。根据海岛群所处海区、与大陆联通程度、海岛气候类型及数据可获取性等方面考虑选取长岛岛群、南澳岛岛群及涠洲岛岛群进行海岛群发展水平评价,并对结果进行比较分析。最终评价结果长岛岛群发展水平优于南澳岛岛群和涠洲岛岛群,分析可得海岛群基础设施条件的完善程度、海岛旅游的发展水平的高低、保护海岛生态环境的力度大小和当地政府对海岛的重视程度是促进海岛地区快速发展的主要因素。

     

    Abstract: Under the background of the marine economic powerful nation strategy, the development of islands is restricted by their special natural conditions, which is relatively backward compared with their neighboring land. Most China's islands are scattered in different areas, and play a role as an important “bridgehead” in the process of human discovering the ocean, therefore, the coastal provinces and cities have been always seriously concerning about the development of islands. The evaluation model of island group is constructed with the evaluation index that considering four aspects: resource supply capacity, ecological environment carrying capacity, economic development capacity, and the social support capacity of the island group. The Changdao island group, Nanao island group, and Weizhou island group are selected to conduct the development evaluation, according to their location, connectivity with land, climate type, and availability of data. The evaluation results of above island groups are compared and analyzed. The evaluation results indicate the development of Changdao island group is superior to the Nanao and Weizhou island groups. Referring the analysis, the infrastructure conditions, the tourism development stage, the effective protection of ecological environment, and the attention from local government are the major factors of determining the development of island area.

     

/

返回文章
返回