粟丽, 黄梓荣, 陈作志. 广东沿岸不同海域浮游植物群落结构特征的比较分析[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2017, 36(1): 61-65. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170110
引用本文: 粟丽, 黄梓荣, 陈作志. 广东沿岸不同海域浮游植物群落结构特征的比较分析[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2017, 36(1): 61-65. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170110
SU Li, HUANG Zi-rong, CHEN Zuo-zhi. Comparative analysis on community characteristics of phytoplankton in different sea areas of Guangdong seacoast[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(1): 61-65. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170110
Citation: SU Li, HUANG Zi-rong, CHEN Zuo-zhi. Comparative analysis on community characteristics of phytoplankton in different sea areas of Guangdong seacoast[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(1): 61-65. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170110

广东沿岸不同海域浮游植物群落结构特征的比较分析

Comparative analysis on community characteristics of phytoplankton in different sea areas of Guangdong seacoast

  • 摘要: 根据2013年9月茂名、珠海及陆丰海域调查数据,对3个海域浮游植物种类组成、丰度分布、优势种组成及多样性等群落结构特征进行了分析。结果显示:3个海域共鉴定浮游植物4门112种,其中硅藻87种,占种类数的77.68%;甲藻17种,占15.18%;绿藻5种,占4.46%;蓝藻3种,占2.68%。其中茂名海域出现了52种,珠海海域67种,陆丰海域63种。3个海域Jaccard种类相似性指数茂名与珠海海域最高0.38。浮游植物平均丰度茂名海域最高(356.21×104/L),其次为荷包岛海域(25.13×104/L),陆丰海域最低(1.66×104/L)。3个海域优势种组成差异较大,共出现了10种,仅柔弱拟菱形藻(Peseudo-nitzschia delicatissima)为共同种类;优势种优势度指数茂名海域极高,高达0.99,其次为陆丰海域0.59。Shannon-Wiener多样性指数H'、Pielou均匀度指数J'和Margalef物种丰富度指数D珠海(2.98、0.60、1.13)、陆丰(1.57、0.35、1.03)高于茂名(0.11、0.03、0.73)。3个海域水质状况的生物多样性指数综合评价显示,珠海海域水质状况最好,群落结构最稳定,茂名海域则最差。

     

    Abstract: Based on phytoplankton survey date in September 2013 in Maoming,Zhuhai and Lufeng city,the species composition,abundance distribution,dominant species and diversity of phytoplankton were analyzed.Results showed that a total of 112 phytoplankton species were identified in four phylum.87 species of Bacillariophyta,accounting for 77.68%,17 species of Pyrrophyta,accounting for 15.18%,5 species of Chlorophyta,accounting for 4.46%,3 species of Cyanophyta,accounting for 2.68% respectively.Phytoplankton in Maoming was 52 species,in Zhuhai was 67 species,in Lufeng was 63 species.The abundance of phytoplankton was highest in Maoming sea,with an average of 356.21×104cells·L-1,followed by Zhuhai sea,with an average of 25.13×104cells·L-1,without doubt Lufeng sea was lowest,with the average of 1.66×104cells·L-1.Ten dominant species appeared in three sea area,and the composition of dominant species were different in each area,only Peseudo-nitzschia delicatissima appeared in all survey sea.Dominant index was very high in Maoming,as high as 0.99,followed by Lufeng 0.59.Shannon-Wiener diversity index H',Pielou evenness index J' and Margalef richness index D were higher in Zhuhai (2.98,0.60,1.13) and Lufeng (1.57,0.35,1.03) than Maoming (0.11,0.03,0.73).Biodiversity index comprehensive evaluation displayed that the water quality was good in Zhuhai sea and the phytoplankton community structure was stable,while in Maoming sea was bad.

     

/

返回文章
返回