顾杰, 李正尧, 冒小丹, 胡成飞, 匡翠萍, 张万磊. 夏季北戴河海域COD环境容量研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2017, 36(5): 682-687. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170507
引用本文: 顾杰, 李正尧, 冒小丹, 胡成飞, 匡翠萍, 张万磊. 夏季北戴河海域COD环境容量研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2017, 36(5): 682-687. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170507
GU Jie, LI Zheng-yao, MAO Xiao-dan, HU Cheng-fei, KUANG Cui-ping, ZHANG Wan-lei. Study of COD environmental capacity in coastal waters of Beidaihe in summer[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(5): 682-687. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170507
Citation: GU Jie, LI Zheng-yao, MAO Xiao-dan, HU Cheng-fei, KUANG Cui-ping, ZHANG Wan-lei. Study of COD environmental capacity in coastal waters of Beidaihe in summer[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(5): 682-687. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170507

夏季北戴河海域COD环境容量研究

Study of COD environmental capacity in coastal waters of Beidaihe in summer

  • 摘要: 应用Mike 21软件建立了北戴河海域水动力与污染物输运数学模型,模型范围包括人造河、洋河和戴河3条入海河流。然后采用实测潮流和化学需氧量(COD)浓度对数学模型进行了验证。最后通过对河流不同的源强削减方案进行模拟和比较分析。研究结果表明:2013年8月戴河口、洋河口和人造河口海域的COD环境容量分别为375.076 t、346.803 t和309.833 t,其中洋河源强削减最大,人造河次之,戴河最小;各河口单独削减相同比例的COD源强在近岸海域产生的超标面积不等,水体交换能力较弱的戴河削减效果较洋河和人造河更显著;随着源强削减比例增加,超标面积减小,但减幅变低。

     

    Abstract: A hydrodynamic and pollutant transport model of Beidaihe coastal water is first setup by the utilization of Mike 21 software, and the model includes the Renzaohe River, the Yanghe River and the Daihe River. Then the model is well verified by measured data of tidal current and concentration of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). Finally, the effects of different schemes on reduction of river pollution source strength are compared and analyzed through numerical simulation results. Numerical results indicate that the COD environmental capacities in coastal areas around the Renzaohe River, the Yanghe River and the Daihe River are 375.076 t, 346.803 t and 309.833 t respectively in August, 2013, and required reduction amounts of COD source strength from high to low are the Yanghe River, the Renzaohe River and the Daihe River. The areas where the COD concentration is over the standard value are different even though there are the same reduction ratio of pollution source strength in three rivers, i.e., the effectiveness of pollution reduction in the Daihe River due to weak water exchange capacity is higher than that in the Yanghe River and the Renzaohe River. With the increase of reduction ratio of river pollution source strength, exceed standard area decreases, but its decrease rate becomes low.

     

/

返回文章
返回