Study on the judicial authentication of marine environmental pollution damage and its evidentiary effect
-
1.
North China Sea Environmental Monitoring Center of SOA, Qingdao 266033, China;
-
2.
Ocean University of China, College of Physical Environmental Oceanography, Qingdao 266100, China;
-
3.
Key Laboratory of Marine Spill Oil Identification and Damage Assessment Technology of SOA, Qingdao 266033, China
-
Received Date:
2014-03-19
Accepted Date:
2014-05-14
-
Abstract
The specialization and complexity of marine environmental pollution suitcases promote the significance of judicial authentication of marine environmental pollution damage. The effect of evidence of judicial authentication includes the competency of evidence and the weight of proof. This paper analyzes the subjects, procedures and methods of judicial authentication, in order to regulate the behaviors relative to judicial authentication and lay the foundation of handling the pollution incidents scientifically.
-
-
References
|
[1]
|
杨素娟.论环境侵权诉讼中的因果关系推定[J].法学评论,2003(4):133-139.[2]最高人民法院.关于审理船舶油污损害赔偿纠纷案件若干问题的规定(法释〔2011〕14号)[Z].2011-01-11.[3]宋 婷.论海事诉讼鉴定结论审查模式的构建[D].大连:大连海事大学,2009:6.[4]王 伟.论环境污染因果关系鉴定证据[J].环境保护,2008(10):30-33.[5] GB/T l2763-2007,海洋调查规范[S].[6] GB 17378-2007,海洋监测规范[S].[7] GB/T 14914-2006,海滨观测规范[S].[8] GB/T 21247-2007,海面溢油鉴别系统规范[S].[9] HY/T 095-2007,海洋溢油生态损害评估技术导则[S] .[10]FOSTER K R,HUBER P W.对科学证据的认定科学知识和联邦法院[M].王增森,译.北京:法律出版社,2001:320-321.[12]何家弘.司法鉴定导论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000:106-107.[13]何家弘.从应然到实然证据法学探究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2008:254.
|
-
-
Proportional views
-
DownLoad: